Jan. 16th, 2017

muccamukk: Captain America reading a book. Text: "Modly Cap." (Marvel: Modly Cap)
[personal profile] garrideb asked: I'm curious about your experiences running exchanges/fests... anything really: a notable anecdote, a lesson learned, smoothest/least smooth, that kind of thing.

I learned most of my fest modding by starting out as a team mod with the above lovely soul and [personal profile] valtyr on [livejournal.com profile] cap_ironman. We sort of figured out a lot of it together, and I did eventually branched out to leading on projects. I think I did the first RBB? I definitely did the third holiday exchange, but by that point Valtyr had already been lead on the first two, so we had the system pretty well worked out. (In retrospect, a lot of the event-focus on that comm is our fault. We're sorry, current mods. We know it's a lot of work.)

I've also participated in a lot of fests, especially multi-fandom, AO3-based fests, so I haven benefitted hugely by having a lot of templates to copy off of, and seen how well things work, or don't work. Plus I spend a lot of time hanging out on the F_FA exchange threads, and seeing other mods and participants argue endlessly about the virtues of different systems.

Things people want in a fest:
  • Clear communication. It doesn't have to be immediate answers to every question. You can say "I need to consider this (with the other mod)," but answering all comments in a timely fashion, and promptly posting schedule changes is a must. If people don't understand the rules, explain them more clearly. If Team Mod is going to be off line for a couple days, it's good to mention it.

  • Consistant modding. The mod's friends don't get a break, for one, but also the rules have to be universally applied and easy to understand. A default is a default, and it doesn't matter who or why. Fandoms should be treated fairly, without the mod's favourite fandoms getting rules exemptions or more room in the spotlight. Conversely, thine enemies may participate. Don't be an ass to them. (In reality, thine enemies are mostly not likely to touch anything thou moddest with a barge pole, which is nice.)

  • Flexibility. The mods don't actually have to explain why something's a rule, and certainly don't have to change anything, but they should at least know why the rules say what they do, and why the schedule is on certain days. And if someone has a better suggestion, and there's still time, the rules are not graven into stone.

  • Rolling with the punches. Sometimes, disaster strikes. The [community profile] trickortreatex mod's work place was hit by a tree a couple years ago. 15-25% of participants default, and half of those indicate that by vanishing into thin air. People delete their fic two hours before the archive opens. Pinch hitters come down with the flu, your cat gets sick, your internet stops working, and it all happens at exactly the same time. It's good to have contingency plans, and a lot of this can be dealt with built in features like extra time between due dates and reveals, and a robust pinch hitters list, but not everything is covered by that (A TREE!). Public panic is not the answer. Just keep the participants updated as to changes, and they'll be really nice about it.

Things to know before you mod a fest, especially a large one:
  • It's a time sink. There are going to be a couple days where you do nothing but deal with this shit. They are a) right when the fest opens and people want to know about the rules, b) nominations period, especially the first and last day, c) last day of sign ups, but mostly d) the day previous to through the day after the due date, and e) the day of reveals. It's REALLY good to have a co-mod or mods on a big fest, purely to help out with the busy times, and to cover you if you're hit by a tree. Also you will lose most of the due date.

  • AO3 is out to get you. Actually, it's probably not, but the time to work out how to deal with the tag set during nominations is NOT during actual nominations. Set up a practice tag set, and work out how you're going to handle duplicates, jumping tags, idiosyncratic synning, and comicbook fandom. It's not bad once you get the hang of it, but likewise it's not totally intuitive. In the same spirit. Run a practice sign up through when you open sign ups. Not all the ticky boxes mean what you think they mean. I've never used AO3 to hand match, but I understand it can be interesting. Definitely figure that out in advance. AO3 does have a lot of tutorials, but nothing is quite the same as trying it yourself. Also, there will be bugs in the middle of things, and the AO3 help volunteers are really nice. Oh, fun fact, if you do staggered reveals, people don't get email notification until the entire collection is marked as revealed. You may have do the e-mails yourself.

  • Not everything has to be on AO3. It's great for hosting and matching multi-fandom stuff, but small fests may be better off doing sign ups elsewhere, or matching elsewhere, or everything elsewhere. It's not a one-size fits all solution. Sometimes a livejournal comment fest is what the situation calls for. Look at what other fests have done, see how it worked.

  • You're probably going to have to maintain at least a couple platforms, say AO3, Tumblr, Dreamwidth and/or e-mail, even if it's just a feed or crossposting. You don't always need all of those plus an imzy comm and a twitter and an LJ and an... whatever kids use these days, but there should be more than one way to get in touch with the mods, and the mods should check all of them regularly.

  • Some people are going to be dicks who try to rules lawyer their way through the fest, put up thinly-vailed place holders and ask for extensions when you catch them. Some people genuinely are just having an unexpectedly shitty week and just need a couple hours to get their submission together. You can usually sort of tell which is which, and it's fine to give people a break, but I would err on the side of strictness. Think about what will happen down the road if they don't come through.

  • If you are modding a fest that covers X-group (rarepairs, small fandoms, a certain gender, a certain kink), make really clear what the boundaries are, and make sure they make sense across various fandoms. There's a reason this is a perennial source of yuletide wank, and it's often good to get a friend to check it out, or put of a draft somewhere and ask people how it will work in fandoms you don't know. Also, make sure your rules aren't actively offensive to the group you're pitching to, with knowledge that people don't always agree in group (I had something unintentionally transphobic in the original femslashex rules. I changed it pretty damn fast, but I wish I'd put more thought into it). I tend to err on the side of generous definitions, because mostly people act in good faith in this area, in my experience.

  • No matter what choices you make, someone is not going to like them, and they are not unlikely to tell you to your face. They're extremely likely to complain about you by name in their own spaces and/or anon spaces. There is nothing you can do about that, except know that arguing with people in anon spaces is not usually a good look. It's probably best just not to go on _coal at all.

  • Don't make critical decisions about the whole fest when stressed out. It doesn't end well.

  • Since public panic is never the answer, do have someone who's willing to listen to you complain about how ALL your participants suck and you never want to do this ever again.

Smoothest fest I've modded was probably the rolling remix last year, mostly because it was small, and had the work of modding spread out over a few months. Roughest has been [community profile] femslashex every year, because it's fucking huge, and the crunch around the due date is awful.

Whew. That got long, and I realise it didn't have much about modding smaller fests. I did a pretty good run down of Rolling Remix and how that worked here. Please comment with your own experiences, everyone.
muccamukk: Natalie and Pepper look on sceptically. (IM: "Natalie"/Pepper)
(According to my stats page, what the people want is epistolary femslash rarepairs. Go figure.)


There was an interesting discussion elsewhere about established relationship fic v. first time fic. I was wondering where the suspension of disbelief begins and ends for people (and how much of it just depends on the quality of the writing).

As a writer, there are only so many times I'm going to find getting some pairings together in various ways interesting (some pairings apparently not so much), but as a reader, I often want some feeling for why a non-canon pairing is together, especially if they're antagonistic in canon, or one of them is dead, or they're a rarepair and I haven't read as much first time fic for them. "Summary: Last issue they were trying to kill each other, but have an established relationship fic about them cooking dinner for each other." can feel a bit jarring, but so can, "It'd been two months since Paul and Diane realised that their antagonism was actually barely-suppressed lust, and one month since Diane had mysteriously returned from the dead." There are variously more and less awkward ways to put that, but it can come across as a little self-justifying. But putting everything in a series doesn't really work a lot of the time either. IDK, maybe an author's note?

I'm overthinking this.
Page generated Sep. 25th, 2017 10:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios